'The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance '

'The theory of cognitive Dissonance states that when someones be presented with info that implies we deport in a way that contradicts our honourable standards, we experience discomfort (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 191). This is considered Cognitive Dissonance.\n\nA psychological termination used to shuffle out mental strife that occurs when beliefs or assumptions argon contradicted by bran- young information; arouses disquietude or stress; relieved by unrivaled of several(prenominal) defensive maneuvers: rejecting, explaining away, or avoiding new information; persuading self that no conflict unfeignedly exists; reconciling differences; or resorting to any some different defensive representation of preserving stability or prescribe in conception of innovation and of self; premier(prenominal) introduced in fifties; has become study point of treatment and research in psychology (as cited in Comptons interactive Encyclopedia, 1996).\n\nThis theory was r eal by Leon Festinger (1957), is touch with the relationships among cognizances. Cognition, for the purpose of this theory, may be estimate of as a piece of knowledge, thoughts, feelings, or beliefs. Knowledge may be near an attitude, an emotion, a fashion, or a value. For instance, the point that you like the ruse red is cognition. sight befool a massive join of cognitions at the equivalent time, and these cognitions create irrelevant, relationships with one another. Therefore, that the devil cognitions have nothing to do with each other. This occurs nearly often when we do something that contradicts our moral beliefs.\nIf divergence is experienced it is most al slipway uncomfortable, so the individual is move to compress it. This causes the individual to identify the magnitude of their discomfort and, it is feasible to predict what we preempt do to trim back dissonance. There ar triad elemental ways to reduce dissonance. First atomic lean 18 changing co gnitions, an display case is if two cognitions go intot bear on we stern castrate one to make it relate to the other; or form each cognition in the steerage of the other. The second is adding cognitions, if two cognitions cause a certain spirit level of dissonance, adding one or more cognitions can reduce the grad of dissonance. The third is altering importance, attempting to justify the behavior by adding new cognitions. These are the three basic ways of reducing cognitive dissonance (Aronson, Wilson, and Akert, 1998, P. 192).\n\nLeon Festinger and crowd Carlsmith also time-tested his theory in 1959. They put any the participants through a dull proletariat. The task consisted in placing a large number of spools on pegs...If you requisite to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Top quality Cheap custom essays - BestEssayCheap. Our expert essay writers guarantee remarkable quality with 24/7. If you are not good enough at writing and expressing your ide as on a topic... You want to get good grades? Hire them ... Best Essay Cheap - High Quality for Affordable Price'